Looks to me like legal arguments on both sides of the issue are missing the REAL point...
- The original nine litigants do not represent the rest of us (the 2000+ more residents) along the Tittabawassee River floodplain!
- The 101 or 147 (or whatever) litigants do not represent the rest of us along the Tittabawassee River floodplain.
- The Lonetree Council, represented by Michelle Hurd-Riddick and Terry Miller does not represent the rest of us along the Tittabawassee River floodplain.
- The rest of us along the Tittabawassee River floodplain are citizens who vote regularly and believe that is the way to choose those who represent us!
- Our House of Representatives represents us and showed us their support when they approved House Bill 4617 (proposed Senate Bill 390) by a large majority vote of 77-29.
- The class action may not be about 'facility' but it is about those of us who do not want our homes labeled 'facility.'
- The same people who want to retain the 'facility' designation are the litigants who claim their property value is diminished by Dow Chemical.
- The same people who want to retain the 'facility' designation are the litigants who spread their word that their property is worthless.
The rest of us 2000+ residents do not consider our property worthless and we continue to work and play in our yards with no regard for the fear-mongering efforts of the few (be they 9, 101 or 147).
No comments:
Post a Comment